Lennart Thornros <[email protected]> wrote: I disagree Jed. > I think you have received a message as good as you could expect. COP is 6. >
You mean in the 2012 Penon report. Right? Where does it say the COP is 6? It says output was 2.5 ~ 3.7 kW, and input was 3.6 kW. I do not think much of the methodology. I recommend calibrations and the use of thermocouple to augment the IR camera. I admit I have not looked as closely as I did to the Levi reports, but I am not impressed. I have no idea how Penon measured the output from the 1 MW reactor, but he does not seem good at calorimetry. > The quality of the person doing the report and his qualifications you can > judge when you have all information. Way too early to put up new obstacles. > If you are talking about the 2012 report we have had plenty of time and information. I am not sure what you refer to. - Jed
