Jed, The info about COP I took from Rossi's pressrelease: According to the independent third party report, over the 352 day test period, the E-Cat consistently generated energy at a rate in excess of six (6) times the amount of energy consumed by the plant, often generating energy exceeding fifty (50) times the amount of energy consumed during the same period. According to Andrea Rossi, Leonardo Corporation considers the results of the third party test to be "an overwhelming success" and that It is just mind boggling to me that you disqualify the measurements and the methods before you have any details. Just let things play out. It has been in pipeline for over 25 years, there is result from serious tests that confirm that it is possible. I agree there are several steps to go: engineering, theory etc.. See the positive and I think Rossi is correct saying; "the world is one step closer to the realization of a commercially available new, clean and efficient energy source."
Best Regards , Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.com +1 916 436 1899 Whatever you vividly imagine, ardently desire, sincerely believe and enthusiastically act upon, must inevitably come to pass. (PJM) On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Lennart Thornros <lenn...@thornros.com> wrote: > > I disagree Jed. >> I think you have received a message as good as you could expect. COP is 6. >> > > You mean in the 2012 Penon report. Right? Where does it say the COP is 6? > It says output was 2.5 ~ 3.7 kW, and input was 3.6 kW. > > I do not think much of the methodology. I recommend calibrations and the > use of thermocouple to augment the IR camera. > > I admit I have not looked as closely as I did to the Levi reports, but I > am not impressed. I have no idea how Penon measured the output from the 1 > MW reactor, but he does not seem good at calorimetry. > > > >> The quality of the person doing the report and his qualifications you can >> judge when you have all information. Way too early to put up new obstacles. >> > > If you are talking about the 2012 report we have had plenty of time and > information. I am not sure what you refer to. > > - Jed > > >
