Agreed, a settlment seems likely. On Wednesday, April 6, 2016, Lennart Thornros <lenn...@thornros.com> wrote:
> 89 million dollars is a lot of money. > I think there will be a settlement within three months. > I do not think we need to find out who is the bad boy. > I think they all are in a league they have not played before. > My reasoning for believing in a settlement is that they destroy the lead > to the market if they drag this out. > > Best Regards , > Lennart Thornros > > > lenn...@thornros.com > +1 916 436 1899 > > Whatever you vividly imagine, ardently desire, sincerely believe and > enthusiastically act upon, must inevitably come to pass. (PJM) > > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 6:55 PM, Lennart Thornros <lenn...@thornros.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','lenn...@thornros.com');>> wrote: > >> Jed, >> I am amazed. You just say things. no support as far as I can see. >> You said in black I think in red. >> While I have not disqualified these measurements, I have some doubts >> about them because: >> >> 1. Based on his previous work, Penon is not qualified to do calorimetry. I >> have no clue about how well you know this guys qualifications except you >> read a report you think was flawed. If the COP was 50, then I (and I am not >> good at calorimetry) could give the answer that at least COP6 was reached. >> >> 2. Penon is not independent of Rossi. How do you know that? How could IH >> use a guy they suspect is in Rossi's pocket. You underestimate the players. >> >> 3. He is not licensed in Florida to do this kind of measurement. Sorry >> but license is just an issue of passing a simple exam and pay the fees. I >> know there is probably some experience required but that can always be >> fixed - believe me.BTW if he is licensed anywhere would that make a >> difference. >> >> 4. I. H. said they disagree with the result. They know more about >> calorimetry than Penon does, so I am inclined to believe them. Now you >> are way out of line. IH does not know anything. My guess is that Darden and >> I are equal when it comes to calorimetry. Other people in IH are not in the >> picture and then calorimetry is not the only way to get things secured. >> >> I will have to wait to see the report. I agree you are way too early. My >> guess is that it will never be published, so we will never know who is >> right. I would have agreed with you a couple of days ago. Now we might >> see a lawsuit and then this report will be fully disclosed. It will take a >> couple of years but . . . >> >> I do not know if you doubt that we are approaching a new technology that >> can have positive impact on many areas of life or ??? >> >> Best Regards , >> Lennart Thornros >> >> >> lenn...@thornros.com >> +1 916 436 1899 >> >> Whatever you vividly imagine, ardently desire, sincerely believe and >> enthusiastically act upon, must inevitably come to pass. (PJM) >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jedrothw...@gmail.com');>> wrote: >> >>> Lennart Thornros <lenn...@thornros.com >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','lenn...@thornros.com');>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> The info about COP I took from Rossi's pressrelease: >>>> According to the independent third party report, over the 352 day test >>>> period, the E-Cat consistently generated energy at a rate in excess of six >>>> (6) times the amount of energy consumed by the plant, often generating >>>> energy exceeding fifty (50) times the amount of energy consumed during the >>>> same period. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> It is just mind boggling to me that you disqualify the measurements and >>>> the methods before you have any details. >>>> >>> >>> I have not disqualified these measurements. I have not seen them. I was >>> talking about Penon's previous report. It was lousy. >>> >>> While I have not disqualified these measurements, I have some doubts >>> about them because: >>> >>> 1. Based on his previous work, Penon is not qualified to do calorimetry. >>> >>> 2. Penon is not independent of Rossi. >>> >>> 3. He is not licensed in Florida to do this kind of measurement. >>> >>> 4. I. H. said they disagree with the result. They know more about >>> calorimetry than Penon does, so I am inclined to believe them. >>> >>> I will have to wait to see the report. My guess is that it will never be >>> published, so we will never know who is right. >>> >>> >>> >>>> See the positive and I think Rossi is correct saying; "the world is >>>> one step closer to the realization of a commercially available new, clean >>>> and efficient energy source." >>>> >>> >>> I doubt it. >>> >>> - Jed >>> >>> >> >
