Jones wrote: " is English your second language or do you simply prefer not
to understand it when it fits your puerile agenda? Why not go back and
read the
posts before making a further obnoxious jerk out of yourself.
AA. As I was educated in England I suspect it is more likely your
second language. You don't understand what puerile means or misuse it.
You are wrong. I have read the previous posts. I disagree with your
opinion.
Jones. "You stated in response to the original post on Wang's headline:
"Seems 90%
thought the article was biased and wrong". When I checked on the
comments to
verify your version, the negativists are nowhere near 90% and seem to have
screen names like masterblaster, nightcreature, oystea, jarea, etc. and
to me,
those are anonymous fan-boys names, at least when they show extreme
gullibility
and anti-science attitude, accepting everything they are told by a
consummate
con-artist and fraudster. How can anyone respond seriously to a
masterblaster?"
AA. At the time I read it the majority of comments were critical on the
piece. Names are not necessarily informative. I don't know who you
are. The first two pages of Google only identifies two Jones Beenes.
One Jones Beene works at Chava Science (subsidiary of Chava Wind) the
other is lead guitarist and "chief bottle washer" at Soncured Records.
Jones. Yes - I do realize that "goat-guy" is also a screen name, but
from his long
string of intelligent postings over the years, he is certainly not among
your
so-called 90%. So you are clearly wrong on the percentages … but who
takes you
seriously anyway since you seldom try to understand? Your gullibility
completely overwhelms any scientific contribution you might try to make
here,
at least based on rereading some of your prior posts. You seem to want to
come-off as politically well-connected and involved in executive
decisions, but
all I see is bluster and ignorance.
AA. Insults and ad hominems are what I expect from you. Now that is
puerile.
As far as I can tell, anybody who disagrees with you about Rossi you
call a "fanboy."
Why do you dismiss the ERV's report before you have seen it? Try to
answer the question and not go off into your usual ad hominem attacks or
change the subject..
