Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: Why did IH allow Penon to remain the ERV if he was incompetent or > dishonest? Why did IH allow the test to continue with a flawed calorimetry > plan? Why wasn't the calorimetry design changed to the satisfaction of IH > early on in the test? >
I do not know, but these issues have nothing to with calorimetry. You cannot use these questions to magically discover what type of instruments were used, or how they were employed. Only one thing counts here. Did the machine produce 50 times input? Or did it produce no excess heat? The questions you ask will not bring you any closer to the answer. Only the data can answer that. Without data, you know nothing, and you cannot being to guess or speculate who is right. You should not take sides when you know nothing. Did you ash your contacts at IH these questions? What did they say? > Those questions have nothing to do with calorimetry and they are none of my business, and none of your business either. If I did hear anything about such things, I would not say a word about them. This is a technical problem. It is not about company water-cooler gossip. You will not learn the COP of this machine by asking nosy questions about business contracts. > As Rossi claims, why was everything OK until it was time to pay the money? > Rossi claims?!? Rossi has claimed he had a production line set up when there was no such thing. He claims he spent hours inside a 1 MW reactor in a shipping container, when that would kill him in 10 minutes. He has claimed countless ridiculous things. Ignore his claims. Everything was NOT okay, as I have said many times before. > Did IH confront the ERV about their concerns? Did they prepare any > documentation describing their concerns? > Whether they did or not has no bearing on calorimetry. > If this documentation exists, get its ID so it can be located in the trial > docket. > I.H. has not filed a docket yet. Did you not notice that, Mr. Pretend Lawyer? - Jed
