Rossi regretted the IH hookup very early on in the deal and that got Rossi's defence mechanisms fired up way before the 1 year test was designed. We might think of that test as the first stage of a court battle to come from the first days that the test was conducted. All the interfaces and documentation in the test can be seen as setting up of the legal battlefield to come.
Like in any divorce, each party was gathering evidence to show the judge in the future case even through the parties were still nominally married. On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 5:32 PM, a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote: > What "atrocious behavior"? Or are you looking for an excuse to bring up > ad hominems about his ancient legal troubles in Italy? > > On 6/4/2016 5:13 PM, Eric Walker wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 4:09 PM, a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote: > > I KNOW the charged one should not be called guilty until after the trial. >> The question is, do you? >> > > There are the legal questions, and there are the questions of behavior. > Rossi may be found innocent by a court of law, should things come to that > point. That will be hard to say until such a time as there are > counterclaims that are raised. What he is surely guilty of, outside of a > legal context, is atrocious behavior. There is no need for a trial to > adjudicate that question. > > Eric > > >
