a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote:
> Evidence from IH suggests they didn't, > They didn't what? but Rossi was the one who instigated this expensive court case. Do you > really think he would do that, knowing the results would come out, if he > didn't believe he had a case? > I cannot read his mind or judge his motivations. Perhaps he was hoping they would negotiate a quick end to the lawsuit. I know little about lawsuits. Here is what I do know. I know how instruments work. I know that they do not produce exactly the same numbers day after day for weeks. I know pressure cannot be 0.0 bar. I know that you cannot use that kind of flow meter in a half-empty pipe. I know that it is not possible to generate 1 MW of heat in a warehouse with no ventilation without killing the people inside. In short, I can judge the technical issues. I know enough about instruments and calorimetry to do that. When I saw the data, after a few minutes I knew it was impossible, and much of it was fake. You can see the reasons in Exhibit 5. If you disagree with me, and you think the reasons in Exhibit 5 do not prove the claims are wrong, then you are technically illiterate and incapable of judging even the simplest experiment. If you think the claims in Exhibit 5 are lies, then you should explain why Rossi himself repeated those same lies to Lewan. Is he deliberately trying to make himself look like a fraud? - Jed
