Jed,
If you read it in context it is obvious.
I don't know the pipe was only half full. You still haven't come up a
layout.
There is no point in rehashing this all again.
AA
On 12/6/2016 2:39 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
Evidence from IH suggests they didn't,
They didn't what?
but Rossi was the one who instigated this expensive court case.
Do you really think he would do that, knowing the results would
come out, if he didn't believe he had a case?
I cannot read his mind or judge his motivations. Perhaps he was hoping
they would negotiate a quick end to the lawsuit. I know little about
lawsuits.
Here is what I do know. I know how instruments work. I know that they
do not produce exactly the same numbers day after day for weeks. I
know pressure cannot be 0.0 bar. I know that you cannot use that kind
of flow meter in a half-empty pipe. I know that it is not possible to
generate 1 MW of heat in a warehouse with no ventilation without
killing the people inside.
In short, I can judge the technical issues. I know enough about
instruments and calorimetry to do that. When I saw the data, after a
few minutes I knew it was impossible, and much of it was fake. You can
see the reasons in Exhibit 5. If you disagree with me, and you think
the reasons in Exhibit 5 do not prove the claims are wrong, then you
are technically illiterate and incapable of judging even the simplest
experiment.
If you think the claims in Exhibit 5 are lies, then you should explain
why Rossi himself repeated those same lies to Lewan. Is he
deliberately trying to make himself look like a fraud?
- Jed
