https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MWHPW3-hlUw
This video describes the search for bremsstrahlung radiation as seen in the
MFMP experiment as predicted to occur at the onset of HOLE
superconductivity.
The sound is bad, but the experimental search is pictured at 6:00 into the
video.
IMHO, the bremsstrahlung radiation seen in the MFMP experiment shows the
onset of HOLE SUPERCONDUCTIVITY in the Polaritons produced to generate the
LENR reaction.
Some background
Author:
Hamilton Carter
(Texas A\&M Univ)
Do superconductors emit x-rays when they quench? Do holes lead double
lives, undressing and pairing up as electrons when it gets cold? Can the
London penetration depth be explained by holes lowering their kinetic
energy and getting... well... fat? An experimental search is underway for
the x-ray radiation predicted by Hirsch's hole theory of superconductivity.
Originally proffered 25 years ago as a model for high temperature
superconductors,, the theory as it now stands applies to all
superconducting materials. The basics of the hole theory of
superconductivity will be presented, followed by a review of our
experiment's design. You'll come away feeling more comfortable with
covalent bonding, hopping amplitudes, Hamiltonians and coherent states.
You'll learn about pulsed magnetic fields and x-ray detection techniques.
You'll be the envy of your friends at parties as you describe both
superconductor theory and cutting edge experiments on the frontier of
modern physics with confidence and aplomb.
On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 12:06 AM, Mark Jurich <[email protected]> wrote:
> FYI:
>
>
>
> Yes, we (MFMP) did pursue the “Gamma Ray Thing” (we made an unsuccessful
> replication attempt, and I myself have not given up on it), and we cannot
> say there was excess heat, because the apparent excess heat was less than
> the error of the crude calorimeter measurement…
>
>
>
> … I am still trying to convince the group to take another crack at it,
> with a more sophisticated radiation measurement that requires some building
> and a small amount of funding.
>
>
>
> Mark Jurich
>
>
>
> *From:* Kevin O'Malley [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 06, 2017 7:57 PM
> *To:* vortex-l <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled
>
>
>
> Frustratingly, they never pursued the Gamma ray thing. They just dropped
> it without explanation.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 6:43 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> A gamma ray burst was detected in a MFMP experiment just before excess
> heat began. So yes, a nuclear event occurred in the MFMP's apparatus for at
> least that short time.
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 8:57 PM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Celani detected gamma rays when Rossi's reactor got started, and Rossi
> came down hard on him for bringing a Geiger counter. So yes, there was a
> Nuclear event occuring in Rossi's apparatus for at least that short time.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 3:20 PM, Che <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Alain Sepeda <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> I with the crook will be prevented to be a nuisance again...
>
> whoever you think it is (I have an opinion).
>
>
>
> I truly doubt matters are that simple.
>
>
>
> Was there, or was there not, cold fusion occurring, in Rossi's apparatus?
> At any time?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
