When a SPP Bose condensate breaks up protons and neutrons, it absorbs energy, and subatomic particles are also produced.
For the absorbed energy portion, a SPP Bose Condensate has three energy output channels: Light, muons and hawking radiation(heat). The decay of protons and neutrons produces muons as a final decay product. Form this, you can see that most of the energy content of protons and neutrons are converted to muons because muons are so heavy and of course a ton of neutrinos. On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 4:53 PM, bobcook39...@hotmail.com < bobcook39...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Axil— > > > > You indicate that a muon decays into “heat energy” and electrons. > > > > How do you define “heat energy”? Is it the result of an immediate (ultra > fast} reaction producing a new coherent system evolved from the original > coherent system of which the decaying muon was a constituent? Is it EM > radiation which subsequently reacts with the electrons of adjacent > materials some time after the muon decay? > > > > In the LENR reaction you suggest are there other sub-atomic particles > besides the muons and electrons and what are their masses or energies? > > > > Bob Cook > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Saturday, March 17, 2018 1:20:32 PM > *To:* vortex-l > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:LENR fission > > One of the key features of a sucessful LENR reactor design is the high > efficiency conversion of LENR energy into heat. Most of the energy that is > produced by the LENR reaction is formatted as subatomic particle creation. > It is important in a successful LENR reaction design to capture those > particles and convert them to heat energy. One method that might do this > conversion is a magnetic bottle using a quadruple or another charged > particle confining magnetic field. The muons that come out of the LENR > reaction must be confined inside the reactor for up to 10 microseconds to > give them enough time to decay. This decay will convert most of the mass of > the muon ( 105.6583745(24) MeV/c2 )into heat energy and electrons. > > > > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 3:42 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The COP of the Brillouin reactor is now been verified to be under 1.5... >> nearly useless. If I remember correctly, MFMP produced over unity heat in >> some of their experiments but not very much. The same low COP issue arose >> in the Lugano demo. Low COP is a big problem for LENR. Most of the energy >> produced by LENR comes in the form of sub atomic particle generation which >> includes huge numbers of neutrinos. In the LENR reaction, the heat is >> provided by a minor energy channel involving hawking radiation. The >> Brillouin reactor is most likely pumping out a ton of sub atomic particles >> as seen in the experiments of Holmlid. Those particles need to be converted >> to heat. Therefore, the heat rich LENR reactor should be surrounded by a >> blanket of molten lead or thorium salt to capture muons that will catalyze >> muon fission. But this type of fission will produce a ton of neutrons >> similar to a hot fusion reactor. The dream of a LENR reactor in your >> basement might well be impossible unless Rossi has found a way to increase >> the proportion of the reaction energy to be radiated in the form of heat. >> >> To verify if this opinion is well founded, a LENR reactor should be >> surrounded in lead blocks up to a foot thick. We should see a large flux of >> neutrons produced by the lead. >> >> >
