The smelter is selling the output material by weight. If there was a huge weight reduction of 25% over time due to the escape of CO from the output material when that material was in inventory, then this weight reduction would surely show up in the accounting records of the company.
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 10:05 PM <mix...@bigpond.com> wrote: > In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 10 May 2019 21:43:37 -0400: > Hi, > [snip] > >But chemical analysis of the output materiel showed that the CO was* not > * > >chemically > >bound to at least one of those elements. > > Oh really, where does it say this? Note that this statement is NOT the same > thing as saying that Fe & Si were present in the correct proportions. > > >In addition, the amount of this CO > >contamination would need to be 4.25 ton/day. > > Yes. > > > That is 25% of the total > >output product. > > Correct. > > >That amount of contamination is not possible to miss in a > >commercial operation selling to many customers. > > > It might be if they all use the same industry standard testing > methodology, and > that method results in the early release of the CO, which is an odorless > invisible gas. > > > > >It is more likely that your assumptions about how quantum mechanics > >operates in LENR is not well founded. > > Possible, though I don't think it's more likely. > [snip] > Regards, > > > Robin van Spaandonk > > local asymmetry = temporary success > >
