You cannot teach Jed
As member of the FM the ruling USA sect he has to spread, what his
buddies tell him else he will get problems.
Others would say it more rigorously. In case of the Mizuno LENR protocol
he intentionally did spread wrong details. So he is a professional cheater.
We know this because in the mean time the Mizuno patent is available
that refutes all rubbish Jed did claim.
https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/6017-mizuno-replication-and-materials-only/?pageNo=1
Regarding Ivermectin:: Doing an RCT study for a deadly illness is a sign
of mental illness. But exactly this is what Jed references. RCT studies
for CoV-19 can only be done among very mild cases that are completely
irrelevant for the medical outcome of the pandemic. Nevertheless. All
these studies show what I said 2 mails earlier. If you take Ivermectin
then after 2 days CoV-19 is gone.
The best such study comes from Israel and does a full PCR control on
each day!
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.31.21258081v1 OF course
big pharma never references it....
J.W.
On 10.09.2021 03:11, Jonathan Berry wrote:
Oh Jed you really do just love the Pharma lies don't you.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
First off there have been no deaths ever from overdosing with it, a
woman who took x100 times the recommended dosage was fine after 4 days
in hospital.
The negative effects from it are rare, mild and mostly related either
to insane dosing (which is a result of it not being prescribed by
doctors) and it killing parasites that release toxins.
But effectiveness is absolutely conclusive but to do it justice I'll
do that in another post, but the fact remains if there is no harm
(except to parasites and apparently Cancer) then why oppose people
trying it?
Why are they making up lies about it flooding emergency rooms when the
hospital has never treated anyone for it ever?
Why are they making up fake studies that don't exist?
Why are they pushing an experimental that contains the harmful spike
protein that has little beneficial effect and obvious harm?
Why are trying to make it harder to enter accounts of Vaccine harm in
the VARS database? They have been caught making it intentionally hard
with slow loading and timeouts in the Canadian system.
All for a Virus that finally it has been admitted Faucci lied about, &
was involved with making, the evidence for it being gain of function
research.
On Fri, 10 Sept 2021 at 09:14, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com
<mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Jürg Wyttenbach <ju...@datamart.ch <mailto:ju...@datamart.ch>> wrote:
We no longer need any Ivermectin studies as we have real data
from 1'000'000'000 people that now no longer worry CoV-19.
Leading Indian epidemiologists say there is no evidence that
ivermectin had an effect in India. They were interviewed in the
New York Times and elsewhere. Epidemiologists are better at
judging these things than doctors in the field. Doctors have often
been mistaken about the efficacy of a drug. The epidemiologists
say the curves of the recent outbreaks indicate the epidemic
abated because of natural herd immunity in the hard hit districts.
The doctors took antibody tests from a sample of the population.
They found that the infection rate was far higher than official
statistics showed. It was high enough to achieve local herd
immunity. Local herd immunity is why there are multiple waves of
an epidemic in different cities over time.
Double-blind tests of ivermectin show either a very small effect,
or none at all, so it is not possible it has had a giant effect on
the Indian population. The doctors in the field are not more
skilled in administering the drug than the doctors doing the
double-blind tests. The doctors in the field have described their
methods, dosage and so on. Clinical double-blind tests did not
replicate their claims. When a drug has a small effect at best,
the way ivermectin does, the only way to confirm that effect is
with a double blind test.
--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr. 22
8910 Affoltern am Albis
+41 44 760 14 18
+41 79 246 36 06
