Jürg Wyttenbach says; "Ivermectin gives a 100% protection from a COV-19 infection. Start dose is 2 days normal dose then weekly once for 100% protection for 90% protetion every 2 weeks."
And you know this to be true? So are you following your own treatment plan? The best I've seen on this are people that do that, get infected, wind up hospitalized and/or dead. At least you won't have lice when you die. It seems ironic that you would be willing to trust one pharmaceutical (ivermectin) and not another (the vax, the jab aka; Phiser, Moderna, J&J vaccines) that have been studied inside and are well published and documented. We know exactly how and why the vax works against covid. Yet someone with a home remedy that is used to treat lice infections, thinks there is a better solution even though there is no known science that would show how it protects against covid or any other virus for that matter. Ivermectin is just one more of the big lies like Hydroxychloroquine or even injections of 'sodium hypochlorite'. Remember that crazy one that the science community had to be put down as fast as possible before people killed themselves? I really wish you would take your propaganda and keep it to yourself and get your vax instead of wasting everyone time. There are better subjects like Cold Fusion for us to sort out. On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 6:34 AM Jürg Wyttenbach <ju...@datamart.ch> wrote: > You cannot teach Jed > > > As member of the FM the ruling USA sect he has to spread, what his buddies > tell him else he will get problems. > > Others would say it more rigorously. In case of the Mizuno LENR protocol > he intentionally did spread wrong details. So he is a professional cheater. > > We know this because in the mean time the Mizuno patent is available that > refutes all rubbish Jed did claim. > > > https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/6017-mizuno-replication-and-materials-only/?pageNo=1 > > > Regarding Ivermectin:: Doing an RCT study for a deadly illness is a sign > of mental illness. But exactly this is what Jed references. RCT studies for > CoV-19 can only be done among very mild cases that are completely > irrelevant for the medical outcome of the pandemic. Nevertheless. All these > studies show what I said 2 mails earlier. If you take Ivermectin then after > 2 days CoV-19 is gone. > > The best such study comes from Israel and does a full PCR control on each > day! > > https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.31.21258081v1 OF course > big pharma never references it.... > > J.W. > > > On 10.09.2021 03:11, Jonathan Berry wrote: > > Oh Jed you really do just love the Pharma lies don't you. > > Nothing could be further from the truth. > > First off there have been no deaths ever from overdosing with it, a woman > who took x100 times the recommended dosage was fine after 4 days in > hospital. > > The negative effects from it are rare, mild and mostly related either to > insane dosing (which is a result of it not being prescribed by doctors) and > it killing parasites that release toxins. > > But effectiveness is absolutely conclusive but to do it justice I'll do > that in another post, but the fact remains if there is no harm (except to > parasites and apparently Cancer) then why oppose people trying it? > > Why are they making up lies about it flooding emergency rooms when the > hospital has never treated anyone for it ever? > > Why are they making up fake studies that don't exist? > > Why are they pushing an experimental that contains the harmful spike > protein that has little beneficial effect and obvious harm? > > Why are trying to make it harder to enter accounts of Vaccine harm in the > VARS database? They have been caught making it intentionally hard with > slow loading and timeouts in the Canadian system. > > All for a Virus that finally it has been admitted Faucci lied about, & was > involved with making, the evidence for it being gain of function research. > > > > On Fri, 10 Sept 2021 at 09:14, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Jürg Wyttenbach <ju...@datamart.ch> wrote: >> >>> We no longer need any Ivermectin studies as we have real data from >>> 1'000'000'000 people that now no longer worry CoV-19. >>> >> Leading Indian epidemiologists say there is no evidence that ivermectin >> had an effect in India. They were interviewed in the New York Times and >> elsewhere. Epidemiologists are better at judging these things than doctors >> in the field. Doctors have often been mistaken about the efficacy of a >> drug. The epidemiologists say the curves of the recent outbreaks indicate >> the epidemic abated because of natural herd immunity in the hard hit >> districts. The doctors took antibody tests from a sample of the population. >> They found that the infection rate was far higher than official statistics >> showed. It was high enough to achieve local herd immunity. Local herd >> immunity is why there are multiple waves of an epidemic in different cities >> over time. >> >> Double-blind tests of ivermectin show either a very small effect, or none >> at all, so it is not possible it has had a giant effect on the Indian >> population. The doctors in the field are not more skilled in >> administering the drug than the doctors doing the double-blind tests. The >> doctors in the field have described their methods, dosage and so on. >> Clinical double-blind tests did not replicate their claims. When a drug has >> a small effect at best, the way ivermectin does, the only way to confirm >> that effect is with a double blind test. >> >> -- > Jürg Wyttenbach > Bifangstr. 22 > 8910 Affoltern am Albis > > +41 44 760 14 18 > +41 79 246 36 06 > >
