Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to thomas malloy's message of Mon, 21 Apr 2008 11:30:39 -0500 (CDT):
Hi,
[snip]
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to MAJ Todd Hathaway's message of Sat, 19 Apr 2008 17:19:29 -0700
reinterpreting ordinary electrolysis. There must be some additional energy
source involved that is not normally accounted for, and determining exactly what
that energy source is, is the real riddle.
My personal bet is on some form of CF (most likely Hydrino based).
Hum, so can you prove the existance of hydrinos?
At the moment I personally cannot. However I said "most likely", which implies
still some uncertainty.
Well,let me put it another way. if someone were attempting to get an LENR reactor to work. Let's suppose that it worked, measurable anomolus heat out put. Then they built a hydrio generator and bubbled the out put gas into the LENR cell, and it worked measurably better. How would that be for "proof"?
--- Get FREE High Speed Internet from USFamily.Net! --
http://www.usfamily.net/mkt-freepromo.html ---
