On Sep 8, 2008, at 10:07 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
Ed -
You could be right - but the bottom line on it is that all we need,
all we have ever needed, is simply a thorough investigation which
addresses all the issues.
Why were we not afforded that for the millions already spent?
I suspect two reasons. First, the administration has grown
increasingly incompetent under Bush. Therefore even an "honest"
investigation would be handled poorly. Second, because, as I suspect,
important people in the administration had a hand in the event,
efforts were made to keep this information out of the report. This
would require the report to look poor on purpose so as to create an
issue that could distract from the real issue. In addition, certain
events would have to be ignored so that the logical conclusions would
not be obvious. We can see how this event is being controlled simply
by watching the history. Evidence indicating a demolition is
emphasized. This idea is so unrealistic that it focuses attention and
argument, as we see on Vortex. Meanwhile the real crime is completely
overlooked. The real crime is the failure to stop the event even
though prior knowledge was available. These people may be incompetent
at running the country but they are very good at protecting themselves.
Ed
If you have the time ... Please comment on the following criticism -
just in from a Dr. John D. Wyndham, PhD (physics), who wrote a
thought provoking letter to NIST in response to its second
whitewash ...oops... report.
http://www.finelytunedfuture.com/2008/09/physics-phds-response-to-nist.html
