Whoa, creepy. Would that be the "Soviet re-education labour torture camp of
love for selfish thinker to love fellow socialist comrades." 

Stalin: "I wish the people had one big neck so I could strangle them more
easily.

Labour union delegate today: "Tax the super-rich out of existence".

Waaay too creepy.

-----Original Message-----
From: Terry Blanton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 22 September 2008 17:51
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Hidden Societal Megatrend?

Perhaps you should "know" less.  I recommend a 30 day retreat in a
Buddhist monastery.

Terry
Saved by Zero

On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Remi Cornwall
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah John, f.ck yeah!
>
> I know people who are gay, black, white, muslim, jew, disabled, old. I'm
no
> bigot. I help the weak and go out of my way to be a gentle-man.
>
> I know what works and why - I know a woman can't do a fireman's carry of
> someone over 15 stone for 200 yrds, I know that that's why you won't find
> women in the marines, paras or special forces.
>
> I know that men have an edge in track and field and there again that those
> of West African decent have more fast twitch muscles, but then again over
26
> miles women start edging forward again and may actually better at the men
in
> extreme endurance (mmmh, the future of spaceflight could be in the realm
of
> women - same brains for the task, less weight).
>
> I know that more often that not, that boys are difficult to teach and get
in
> trouble but then they *create*. Doesn't mean girls don't it just
> statistically more likely. In fact with a weak old, mutation prone Y
> chromosome men are the best or worse of cases.
>
> I know that Orientals and Jews are more likely to excel at mathematical
> sciences. I don't kid myself with politically correct science; they have
old
> civilisations that favour gene selection for scholasticism and strong
family
> and community structures too.
>
> I know that Africans do very well in school because of their strong family
> structure but are now generally dumbing down when exposed to Caribbean
> culture for all the bastardization and despair that group has suffered.
>
> I know welfare and state medical care does good work but then again strong
> families and communities and a healthy lifestyle would reduce the budget
but
> that would be perceived as 'paternalism'.
>
> I know the personality profile of those who become CEOs and I know what
eats
> out the soul of those in the labour conference at Manchester who say "more
> taxation! nationalise energy production! ban City bonuses, no more fat
> cats!" in that they could only rise to a high position in life, without
> talent, by rabble rousing.
>
> Then again I know what makes those on the old right tick in denying
> opportunity for all with ability because they want to hold on to the
> hegemony or the stupid greed of the stockbroker short selling but
generating
> no *net* wealth.
>
> I don't think I'm gifted in these observations but I am brave and won't
pin
> my colours to any mast and respect those who don't as well.
>
> I'd like less political parties and more independent thinkers in cabinet.
> Although there is chain of command, I don't associate being educated with
> being slavish.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Steck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 22 September 2008 16:38
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Hidden Societal Megatrend?
>
> Men of the future?  Balls.  It seems like most men of today under 40 in
the
> US.  That's why movies like '300' resonate with men so much.  We pine for
> the days when men were allowed to be men, expected to be men, and were
> admired when they were.  We can feel in our bones that we are not being
true
>
> to our natural instincts, our place in the food chain.
>
> Not to jump in the way-back machine, rap a towel around my head, and
forego
> deodorant altogether, but this is the double edged sword of the pendulum
> swing.  In our 'enlightened' well intentioned (although highly
socialistic)
> efforts to equalize outcome for all without conflicts of any kind, we have
> compromised the very socioeconomic backbone of that allows the very luxury
> of that largess.  It is the harbinger of doom of every great society
> throughout history.
>
> Remi, the talent hasn't gone.  It's been surgically removed.... at home,
at
> work, in public.  To lament the outcome of our own self destructive
behavior
>
> 'for the greater good' is laughable.  In a foot race for survival, how
much
> sympathy should someone get who voluntarily hits themselves in the foot
with
>
> a hammer because the person next to them can't (or refuses) to run as
fast?
> That is not 'enlightenment' that's mental illness.
>
> -john
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Remi Cornwall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Men of the future will be pathetic cowards, gagged, neutered,
metro-sexual
>> and inadequate. Then people will start saying, "What's happened, people
>> used
>> to be so effective, things used to get done around here. Where's the
>> talent
>> gone?" The answer:  being sued or worse.
>
>
>
>
>



Reply via email to