OrionWorks wrote:
At this point I'm more curious about the recent behavior of 60 Minutes
in removing APS's implied approval/endorsement of Garwin's analysis.
Garwin? Don't you mean Duncan?
The APS surely support's Garwin's attack during 60 Minutes, and they
would be upset to read Garwin's trip report to SRI at Steve's site.
The APS has also refused to give a nanometer. The last 20 years of
research simply does not exist as far as they are concerned -- and as
far as Park is concerned. These people are not stubborn skeptics,
they are mindless. Totally clueless.
- Jed
