>From Jed: > OrionWorks wrote: > >> At this point I'm more curious about the recent behavior of 60 Minutes >> in removing APS's implied approval/endorsement of Garwin's analysis. > > Garwin? Don't you mean Duncan?
Yes, I meant Duncan. My mistake. Why did 60 Minutes apparently remove APS's implied approval/endorsement of Duncan's analysis? Was there a legal issue here? > The APS surely support's Garwin's attack during 60 Minutes, and they would > be upset to read Garwin's trip report to SRI at Steve's site. > > The APS has also refused to give a nanometer. The last 20 years of research > simply does not exist as far as they are concerned -- and as far as Park is > concerned. These people are not stubborn skeptics, they are mindless. > Totally clueless. What happens next? And does it matter? Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
