Snip: Of course, people with imagination will suggest all kinds of explanations. The number of crazy ideas should not distract serious investigators from seeing the most obvious conclusion, i.e. that life has evolved on many planets and some of this life is more advanced than we are..
Reply: Ed, I have to say that my temporal lens idea better fits the known facts regarding electromagnetic observations, be they visual or radar and may even allow some physical contact although the lack of physical evidence suggests otherwise. There is already a corollary in place called gravitational lensing so my proposal attempts to explain the observations with the fewest assumptions possible. I see the spacecraft reports and radar returns as evidence of our own future spacecraft probably interacting with HV fields in the present to create focal points where the observer views across time lines. The NASA shuttle controversy where the charged tether broke and UFO like objects appear behind the miles of still charged tether line viewed by the shuttle camera filming down the axis of the charged line suggest temporal lensing is real. It is also a fact that many photos and reports are near HV lines which would act as a single lens, I would presume the UFO propulsion supplies a second lens and then it is just a matter of the observer to be at the correct coordinates where the focal point resolves. Maybe this hypothesis can be tested with the appropriate selection of an observation point near a HV nexus Fran