Thank you for the informative reply Mauro! I guess I should have phrased my question with fewer assumptions... I am not (as far as I know) trying to fan any "speculative philosophy" or doomsday fears , rather I am interested in this phenomena as it may or may not relate to another "vacuum energy" conduit thing I have been playing with. My thinking is as follows: galactic center point would be the center of the milky way (roughly) and since it is stars they are blasting all kinds bands outward from their sources. if some isotropic-like radiator like a huge cluster of stars was causing a field that the earth moves into and out of or close and then far from that causes changes in decay rates of radioactive substances, I was just wondering what kind of field interaction the might cause? Could one amplitude modulate a chunk of cesium's emissions by moving the whole earth (ignoring orbits etc like you picked up a ball and shook it violently) in and out of this field? Could this field be "induced" into a tight crystalin structure and extracted via high frequency virtual photon interaction to create an input-dipole AKA "electron holes"? If this structure is on earth and it was "inter facing" with the larger field that is. I have been trying to methodically disprove by experiment different effects as the possible source of the a phenomena I stumbled across in order to figure out how it works. (chemical, RF induction, magnetic induction, heat changes, photon ex citation, etc). Could your effect be causing the phenomena I observe? Thanks again! BTW I really was not trying to bring up 2012/nibiru/annunaki etc!
On 9/8/10, Mauro Lacy <ma...@lacy.com.ar> wrote: > On 09/08/2010 01:16 AM, Cosmo Manning wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have been lurking and have to ask a burning question! >> Mauro Lacy or anyone: in a hypothetical situation... Let's say for >> instance that the earth was in near alignment with galactic central >> point and then wobbled about it for a few days (such as it does at the >> winter solstice). What kind of fluctuations would be expected by your >> hypothesis? >> > > "Galactic alignment with galactic central point". What does that mean? > When you're in a circular, or quasi circular, motion, you are *always* > "aligned" with the center of the circle. > > Look, we're actually at 0.02 degrees above (north of) the galactic > plane. Because the distance to the center of the galaxy is of many light > years, those 0.02 degrees are a relatively long distance. And we're > actually traveling *farther* from the galactic plane, due to our actual > direction of motion towards the Solar Apex, which is in the northern > hemisphere. So, there's also no chance that we'll "cross the galactic > plane" anytime soon. > > It seems to me that you're confusing or mixing the apparent motion of > the Sun at the solstices, with so called "galactic alignment". Take into > account that the galactic distances are huge. My take is that we will > not see any sudden changes in relation to any galactic related motion. > We're "wobbling" inside the galaxy arm at 16.6 km/s. That's slow > movement, in relation to galactic (extra solar system) distances. Even > more: the conventional view is that that movement is a linear one, that > is, at the moment, and as far as I know, scientists are unable to > calculate the rate of curvature of such "wobble". That can give you an > idea of the times and distances involved. > We're also traveling at 220 km/s in the general direction of galactic > rotation. That means that we'll complete a hypothetical turn in 220 > million years! And as I said, although that velocity is one order of > magnitude greater than the movement towards the solar apex, we're always > "aligned" to the center, in relation to that movement, because that > movement is (roughly) on the circumference of a circle. > > Now, in relation to 2012 and doomsday scenarios, I'll take the chance > here and say what I think, once and for all: > In my opinion, 2012 in particular has nothing to do with "galactic > alignment"(alignment with what?), crossing of the galactic plane, > changing "galactic frequencies", or whatever you want to call it in your > particular brand or mix of "speculative philosophy". > > There's a lot of hype and exaggeration. Even National Geographic, > Discovery and History channel are feeding the fire of the coming final > days. All they do in these "documentaries" is to emphasize the negative > aspects of change, that is, those of destruction, upheaval, crisis, > suffering and, in a general sense, doom. There will be no doomsday. I > repeat: no doomsday. No end of the world. > > But, and this is undeniable, we're experiencing a lot of unusual things, > mostly in weather patterns, also in the occurrence of volcanoes and > earthquakes, floodings, extreme weather, etc. > In my opinion, the weather, also earthquakes and volcanoes, that is, > seismic activity on Earth, and also other, "subtler" phenomena, are all > related to cosmic phenomena. In particular, to the activity of the Sun, > but also to planetary positions and alignments, oppositions, etc. We're > just starting to see and understand these connections, and that > understanding will eventually lead to a new, scientific form of the old > science of astrology, which clearly cannot continue and survive as it is > today. Much water will have to run under the bridge for the actual, > materialistic form of scientific knowledge to embrace and pursue that > knowledge, but it will happen nevertheless, sooner or later, due to the > simple fact that those effects and influences are real. > > We're approaching a particular event that will happen in 2012, which is > related to the weather in forms that we actually don't understand in a > scientific way, but that are probably due to the solar wind and its > interactions with the Earth(i.e. electromagnetic effects, in a broad or > generic form), which are in turn affected or modified by the planets, by > their location in the ecliptic. > The (second) transit of Venus will happen in 2012. The transits of > Venus(Venus "crossing" the Sun in front of the Earth) come in pairs, > separated by 8 years, and those pairs are separated by the next pair by > 105 or 121 years. The first transit happened in 2004. > So, if you study weather patterns, you discover that every hundred years > or so, we have had a decade of uncommon weather. So much for the end of > the times. > > Lastly, I want to add something more: In the very same way as there's a > cycle of day and night, and a cycle of the seasons, there are probably > greater cycles. And those cycles are probably related(in ways that we > quite don't understand yet) to the rise and fall of civilizations on > Earth, and also to the general "state of mind" of the beings on Earth. > To the dark ages and to the golden ages. > But please take into account that the duration of those cycles is large, > in the order of thousands of years, and more. Those changes happen > gradually. What we as human beings can do, and in a certain, very real > way, are obligued by the circumstances to do, is to attune and encompass > those relatively gradual changes. It is my understanding, and this is > clear as day if you know where, what and /how/ to look, we're entering a > new age of enlightenment, a new golden age. It is in that sense that the > concept of apocalipsis must be understood. Apocalypsis meaning "the > rising of the veil.". > As you can imagine, it's very important to understand the Apocalypsis, > the rising of the veil, in a positive, creative, constructive, > enlightening way. And we as human beings can and should work, both > individually and collectivelly, to achieve just that. > > Best regards, > Mauro > > > > > > > > > >> Thanks for your time. >> -Cosmo >> >> On 9/7/10, Mauro Lacy <ma...@lacy.com.ar> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> The results of both papers are addressed, to a certain extent, in >>> "Power Spectrum Analyses of Nuclear Decay Rates" >>> http://arxiv.org/abs/1007.0924 >>> >>> Mauro >>> >>> On 09/06/2010 02:31 PM, Harry Veeder wrote: >>> >>>> Here are two papers which find no evidence of periodic fluctuations in >>>> decay >>>> rates. Both have been published in journals since being uploaded >>>> >>>> to arxiv.org >>>> Harry >>>> >>>> http://arxiv.org/abs/0809.4248 >>>> >>>> Searching for modifications to the exponential radioactive >>>> decay law with the Cassini spacecraft >>>> Authors: Peter S. Cooper >>>> (Submitted on 24 Sep 2008) >>>> >>>> Abstract: Data from the power output of the radioisotope thermoelectric >>>> generators aboard the Cassini spacecraft are used to test the conjecture >>>> that >>>> small deviations observed in terrestrial measurements of the exponential >>>> radioactive decay law are correlated with the Earth-Sun distance. No >>>> significant >>>> deviations from exponential decay are observed over a range of 0.7 - 1.6 >>>> A.U. A >>>> 90% Cl upper limit of 0.84 x 10^-4 is set on a term in the decay rate of >>>> Pu-238 >>>> proportional to 1/R^2 and 0.99 x 10^-4 for a term proportional to 1/R. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> http://arxiv.org/abs/0810.3265 >>>> >>>> Evidence against correlations between nuclear decay rates and Earth-Sun >>>> distance Authors: Eric B. Norman, Edgardo Browne, Howard A. Shugart, >>>> Tenzing H. >>>> Joshi, Richard B. Firestone >>>> (Submitted on 17 Oct 2008) >>>> >>>> Abstract: We have reexamined our previously published data to search for >>>> evidence of correlations between the rates for the alpha, beta-minus, >>>> beta-plus, >>>> and electron-capture decays of 22Na, 44Ti, 108Agm, 121Snm, 133Ba, and >>>> 241Am and >>>> the Earth-Sun distance. We find no evidence for such correlations and >>>> set >>>> limits >>>> on the possible amplitudes of such correlations substantially smaller >>>> than >>>> those >>>> observed in previous experiments. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > > -- Sent from my mobile device
