The short answer is, that I don't have a clear idea about how these energies work with and interact with matter. I think that they are related to velocity, to something equivalent to increased friction. By the way, that could serve to give meaning and measurable qualities to the much needed concept of 'absolute velocity' in Physics.
I think that the weak nuclear force is a result of the "local" environment. Protons are neutrons which began to rotate as a consequence of a kind of friction with their local surroundings. That would explain also the symmetry breaking of the weak nuclear forcein terms of the local(galactic?) environment. If you think you have detected a cosmic effect, the best thing to do first would be to try to pinpoint its origin, the direction from where it's coming. If it's a known effect like beta decay, the method used by Shnoll, counting frequencies, plotting a histogram and finding temporal (and after that, spatial) correlations, looks very good and could probably yield very precise results. If you have a new effect you don't know about, you would have to develop first a way to quantify it, and after that try to relate the measurements with time and location, or orientation. Take into account that there are probably different 'kinds' or 'flavours' of these energies. Those coming from the galactic center can be just one of them, maybe the most intense or 'coarse', but not the only kind. As a reference, consider the following: during the next centuries, the old science of astrology will be gradually rediscovered and researched under a new light. For better or worse, all these energies would have to be considered with their qualitative, not only quantitative, aspects. Take into account also that the best way to approach these studies would be with a non-materialistic and a non-mechanicistic approach. That they will be approached and studied with a materialistic and mechanicistic approach nevertheless, is in a sense unavoidable. All that will have important consequences for our future evolution as human beings. Another important thing is that the potential discoveries should be made public, and for the benefit of all. Best regards, Mauro On 09/08/2010 02:14 PM, Cosmo Manning wrote: > Thank you for the informative reply Mauro! I guess I should have > phrased my question with fewer assumptions... I am not (as far as I > know) trying to fan any "speculative philosophy" or doomsday fears , > rather I am interested in this phenomena as it may or may not relate > to another "vacuum energy" conduit thing I have been playing with. My > thinking is as follows: galactic center point would be the center of > the milky way (roughly) and since it is stars they are blasting all > kinds bands outward from their sources. if some isotropic-like > radiator like a huge cluster of stars was causing a field that the > earth moves into and out of or close and then far from that causes > changes in decay rates of radioactive substances, I was just wondering > what kind of field interaction the might cause? Could one amplitude > modulate a chunk of cesium's emissions by moving the whole earth > (ignoring orbits etc like you picked up a ball and shook it violently) > in and out of this field? Could this field be "induced" into a tight > crystalin structure and extracted via high frequency virtual photon > interaction to create an input-dipole AKA "electron holes"? If this > structure is on earth and it was "inter facing" with the larger field > that is. I have been trying to methodically disprove by experiment > different effects as the possible source of the a phenomena I stumbled > across in order to figure out how it works. (chemical, RF induction, > magnetic induction, heat changes, photon ex citation, etc). Could your > effect be causing the phenomena I observe? Thanks again! BTW I really > was not trying to bring up 2012/nibiru/annunaki etc! >
