In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Tue, 19 Oct 2010 15:28:48 -0400: Hi, [snip] >The assumption underneath this is a strange one, it is that the >reaction, if it exists, must be "d-d fusion." Since there are no >neutrons, no He-3, and, with helium, no gamma rays, *therefore* the >results must be in error. > >Of course, there is an alternate conclusion, just as logical: >"Therefore this is not d-d fusion."
There is a third possibility. It is DD fusion, but the normal path is not followed. There are at least three theories that would make this possible. 1) Takahashi 2) Mine - the energy is carried away from the reaction by a fast electron (IC). 3) Horace's - which I don't quite understand. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html
