The 59Cu explanation seems to be nonsensical, at least with the conventional reaction explanation implied below, because (1) it does not explain the presence of gram quantities of observable copper (due to the 1.36 minute half-life of 59Cu), (2) the huge flux of 0.5 MeV gammas from positron annihilation would be a major risk to the observers, and proof positive of nuclear reaction, eliminating the need to measure heat, (3) the logarithmic tail-off of positron emission, even given the 1.36 m half-life, should be readily detectable for a long time after power off, (4) and the presence of gram quantities of Ni59, with 76000 y half-life for EC, should be readily detectable in the ash via auger electrons or x-rays.

On Jan 22, 2011, at 3:46 AM, Peter Gluck wrote:

Thank you, now everything depend on-Cu is real, or not!
Peter

On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 12:25 AM, <mix...@bigpond.com> wrote:
In reply to  Peter Gluck's message of Fri, 21 Jan 2011 19:31:09 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>That device working for 6 months has produced approx. 50,000 kWhours heat.
>Can this be explained by the reaction of transmutation of Ni to Cu?
>Considering first 300 grams of nichel...? Rossi can tell how much
>Ni is uesd - if he will. Am important rough energy balance anyway.
>Peter
[snip]
If all Ni isotopes react equally, and 2/3 of Ni is Ni-58, and we assume single
proton fusion, then the primary reaction would be:

Ni-58 + H -> Cu-59 + 3.42 MeV

which then decays rapidly via positron decay according to

Cu-59 -> Ni-59 + e+ + neutrino + 4.8 MeV (however a considerable portion of this
will be lost via neutrinos; say 1/2?).

so the total reaction energy is 3.42 + 2.4 = 5.82 MeV / Ni-58.

2/3 *50000 kWh / 6 MeV = 1.2E23 Ni-58 reactions, which is 12 gm Ni-58, or about 18 gm Ni altogether (assuming the other isotopes all yield about the same amount
of energy / atom). So quite within the realm of possibility.

OTOH, if he had 300 gm of Ni, and 1/3 was converted to Cu, then that represents
considerably more energy, and one has to wonder where it all went?

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html



Best regards,

Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/




Reply via email to