This is exceptionally weird, even for Steve Krivit:

http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/02/07/missing-cold-fusion-from-new-energy-times/

I posted a note here mentioning that the best evidence for helium is the
work of Melvin Miles. Krivit said that "New Energy Times has found Melvin
Miles’ reports of helium to be well-supported and unambiguous." Yet he
continues to claim that cold fusion cannot be fusion. I responded:

"Well, if helium is the product, then assuming deuterium is the starting
material, that makes it fusion by definition. Deuterons fuse together to
become helium."

Krivit responded with a vigorous attack on McKubre. I responded with a
message he does not wish to post:

"Assume for the sake of argument all of [this attack on McKubre is] true. It
has no bearing on the results reported by Miles, Gozzi and others who
confirmed helium, and therefore it has no bearing on whether the Pd-D system
fuses deuterium to form helium.

If you agree that Miles is correct, then it seems to me that unless you
think the starting material is something other than deuterium, you agree it
is fusion. Perhaps I misunderstand your position."

I cannot make head or tail of Krivit's views on why cold fusion is not
fusion. How can anyone agree that Miles is well-supported one moment, and
then claim they don't indicate fusion the next moment?!? What else could
they possibly indicate? Miles himself has no doubt the helium proves it is
fusion. I think even Huizenga would agree.

Perhaps Krivit's views are in tune with the Windom - Larsen theory. I don't
know anything about that theory. If it claims the Pd-D process does not
convert deuterium into helium then it is wrong. A theory has to conform to
the known facts. Krivit's attack on McKubre is outrageous nonsense. As Lomax
pointed out, it is not good for the field that someone with such weird
notions is taken seriously by the mass media.

I don't worry about Krivit. This field has any number of both enemies and
misguided supporters. I cannot tell which he is, but I expect one more can
do little harm.

- Jed

Reply via email to