Alan J Fletcher <a...@well.com> wrote:
> So I guess we'll just have to wait and see what happens tomorrow. I > presume nyteknik will report on it .... > You are expecting something to happen tomorrow? I don't get it. Rossi just said there will be no more public tests. Then again he said something about better calorimetry soon, didn't he. He certainly says a lot contradictory stuff. I hope there is something tomorrow. He also said this, which I find exasperating: - Andrea Rossi April 20th, 2011 at 4:50 PM<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=473&cpage=4#comment-34113> Dear James Bowery: Time spent with that kind of Universities is gold. The more, the better: there is really to learn. Warm Regards, A.R. - James Bowery <http://jimbowery.blogspost.com/> April 20th, 2011 at 4:45 PM<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=473&cpage=4#comment-34112> Mr. Rossi, What sort of investment of your time is required for the Universities of Uppsala and Stockholm to test the existing E-CAT prototypes in their facilities? Sincerely, James Bowery ME: Okay, Andrea, if the universities are so great, why are you concentrating on the damned 1 MW reactor? Forget it! Give small ones to the universities instead. I suppose he made some sort of contractual agreement to supply this 1 MW reactor, but any contract can be modified. Modifying this would surely benefit both parties. I cannot understand the high priority of the 1 MW reactor. Maybe I should send him that message, verbatim. Sigh . . . Not much point. I have told him that many times in the past, to no avail. - Jed
