The reason is, in my opinion, that is very difficult to achieve a CONTINUOUS generation of energy- see my paper http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/2011/04/questions-preparing-swot-analysis-of-ni.html what conditions are necessary for a new source of energy.
But I think this year (good for new energy, it seems) Randy will be on the market with his CIHT technology. His theory is OK, verified by experiment. Technology is more difficult than scientific experiments. Peter <http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/2011/04/questions-preparing-swot-analysis-of-ni.html> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Mark Iverson <zeropo...@charter.net> wrote: > I would wager that the reason Mills hasn't got a commercial device, after > 20 years and $60M, is because his theory is flawed... > > -Mark > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Peter Gluck [mailto:peter.gl...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Saturday, May 14, 2011 9:46 PM > > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Rossi bets the farm on Ni62? > > Perhaps the best person to discuss your hydrino ideas is Randy Mills > himself. > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
