Thanks! Perhaps not evrything that Rossi says is absolutely true. Was
sputtering used for isotopic enrichment- actually segregation? Goes it to
the level of individual atoms?
I don't buy the idea of catalysis- it has be more probable
some emhanced nanometric effect.
Peter

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Roarty, Francis X <
francis.x.roa...@lmco.com> wrote:

> Peter,
>
> *Regarding “cheapness” : It appears the “enrichment” Rossi mentions is a
> free side effect of sputtering [Soret effect] that only segregates the
> isotopes by a matter of centimeters but since this places the heavier
> isotopes closer to the cold reactor wall and each other it may be enough to
> amplify the effect – I think this effect was also behind MAHG performance
> but Rossi understands better the need to keep the operation below a
> threshold temp to prevent the powder melting or growing whiskers to short
> the catalytic geometry.*
>
> * *
>
> *Fran*
>  Wednesday, May 25, 2011BUYING THE E-CAT IN THE 
> SACK<http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/2011/05/buying-e-cat-in-sack.html>
>
>
>
> *CHEAPNESS: - *an obvious condition. Just o mention that if the E-cat
> works with isotopically enriched  nickel or the catalyst (?) is some noble
> metal- than there will be serious problems with the price.
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Reply via email to