2011/8/4 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <[email protected]>: > I've done a great deal of research on this topic.
Problem is that mere research is not enough, because you need to be able to do your own conclusions from data and that includes reading other people's mind from between the lines. This is very difficult, because we have always only partial knowledge from other people's mind and there is not much visible words in between lines, but this is also the most difficult and most advanced task what human brain can perform, so that it can phenomenally well construct good working theory of other people's mind and real intentions although data is grossly insufficient. There is no facts that support your opinion. I am also done my research and I can say that there is nothing that contradicts the grand scheme (Isotopic ratios are the strongest argument, but I have not seen results of final analysis by Swedish scientists. Krivit also stated in his #3 report that Nickel-62 enrichment is extremely expensive, but I think that he does not know what he is saying), but I admit that I need to dig perhaps too deep into Rossi's mind. Therefore I am only €40 sure that E-Cat is part of reality! It is unscientific to say that "I am 70% sure that E-Cat is real." It is better to say that "I am €40 sure that E-Cat is real!", what means that I am ready to bet for 40 euros that E-Cat is real. It is sad that I do not have confidence to bet 400 euros, because several people would take the bet, because they are absolutely sure that cold fusion was debunked in 1989 by MIT hot fusion researchers. Several people has already promised to eat their hat and if it is not a straw hat, it is not very healthy for you. But of course it is frustrating that I have no other evidence to support my claim than my opinion. However I have made a slight contribution, that I showed a method how it is possible to calculate accurately enough the real output of E-Cat demonstrations and thus remove the most presented critical arguments. It is not Rossi's fault that he exaggerated the power output, but wrong doers are those scientist, who were unable to do appropriate power output calculations from temperature value. For example, several people ignored completely such a basic experimental protocol as calibrating thermometer. This is unforgivable mistake to do! - Jouni
