I cautioned that making statements of scamming investors, when those statement can not be proven, is defamation. My statements in no way give support to those making scamming statements.

AG


On 11/12/2011 2:41 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
You answer to someone as you were acknowledging such fact.

2011/11/12 Aussie Guy E-Cat <aussieguy.e...@gmail.com <mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com>>

    Ka? I never said Rossi was looking for investors or had any. From
    what I have read he doesn't need them and has self funded this
    project.

    AG



    On 11/12/2011 2:26 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:

        Aussie Guy, if you keep insisting that Rossi asked around for
        investors, you are provoking troll attacks, because you are
        creating a strawman for Rossi. Thus, you are helping with the
        mess around here.

        2011/11/12 Aussie Guy E-Cat <aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
        <mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com>
        <mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
        <mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com>>>


           Mary you just do not get it do you? You can't go around
        saying you
           think Rossi may have scammed investors. That is defamation. You
           don't know if he has any investors, do you? You don't know
        how he
           raised his funding do you? Well he did that by selling a
        business
           and selling his house.

           AG





Reply via email to