On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Not everything there is a scam. At least one is not, which is plasma
> focus, which they frequently feature among the top 5 and is based in an old
> technology. But they never claimed overunity, just 1/100000 of the input
> energy, in the form of neutrons. Actually, a few of their shots is enough
> to kill a person. Their aim is to achieve extremely hot fusion with proton
> and boron 11 (which is the novelty and never attempted before) at 7billionK
> without neutron waste, "only" a huge quantity of high energy x-rays formed
> by collapsing plasma.
>

OK, I admit I didn't review that one in detail but maybe if I had, I'd have
found a much more encompassing claim than that.  Be that as it may, maybe
they did get one right out of a dozen or more.  But basically, they're
merchants of "woo".  They're not, in my estimation, anything resembling
journalists.  It is harmful to our society to have people believing that
you can run a car on water without fuel or even that adding on-board
electrolysis to an internal combustion engine will somehow magically double
it's mileage figures.  But that's typical of what they do.  And worse yet,
they claim such nonsense is being suppressed by oil interests, power
companies, government agencies -- you choose something and they have
probably blamed suppression on it.   People who believe Allan and Mills and
think of them as reliable journalists are at high risk for being scammed by
unscrupulous merchants through no fault of their own.  Such writing is thus
unconscionable.

Reply via email to