For inquiring minds:

Dean Drive: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dean_drive http://www.jerrypournelle.com/science/dean.html
EmDrive: http://emdrive.com/
QDrive: http://www.cannae.com/

AG


On 11/22/2011 2:34 AM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
LENR does not violate neither energy nor momentum.

2011/11/21 Aussie Guy E-Cat <aussieguy.e...@gmail.com <mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com>>

    It should be an interesting next 12 months with at least 2
    companies selling LENR systems. I also note that both the EmDrive
    (Chinese claim to have replicated) and the QDrive reactionless
    space drives apparently work and will cause a few cracks in the
    set in concrete Laws. One wonders if the Dean Drive
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dean_drive also worked but got buried
    like LENR because it COULDN'T work as it violated the Conservation
    of Momentum and we lost 50 years of reactionless drive
    development. I do remember seeing the Dean Drive on Dave
    Garroway's Today Show (in 1958 according to Google) as it hung
    vertical from a chain and pulled a load toward it. Yes I do
    understand stiction. Probably time to put on my flame proof suit. ;)




--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com <mailto:danieldi...@gmail.com>


Reply via email to