AG, I took a quick look at the EmDrive and QDrive information and must say that it would take a lot more effort to have any idea of how they work. One question which I would like to have answered is as follows: Do either of these devices emit electromagnetic radiation in a direction that is opposite to the forward thrust? In my humble way of thinking, momentum is carried away with radio waves just as it would be if actual material were expelled. If these devices emit radio waves, then they do not excite me.
Dave -----Original Message----- From: Aussie Guy E-Cat <aussieguy.e...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Mon, Nov 21, 2011 12:06 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Interesting next 12 months For inquiring minds: Dean Drive: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dean_drive ttp://www.jerrypournelle.com/science/dean.html mDrive: http://emdrive.com/ Drive: http://www.cannae.com/ AG n 11/22/2011 2:34 AM, Daniel Rocha wrote: LENR does not violate neither energy nor momentum. 2011/11/21 Aussie Guy E-Cat <aussieguy.e...@gmail.com <mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com>> It should be an interesting next 12 months with at least 2 companies selling LENR systems. I also note that both the EmDrive (Chinese claim to have replicated) and the QDrive reactionless space drives apparently work and will cause a few cracks in the set in concrete Laws. One wonders if the Dean Drive http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dean_drive also worked but got buried like LENR because it COULDN'T work as it violated the Conservation of Momentum and we lost 50 years of reactionless drive development. I do remember seeing the Dean Drive on Dave Garroway's Today Show (in 1958 according to Google) as it hung vertical from a chain and pulled a load toward it. Yes I do understand stiction. Probably time to put on my flame proof suit. ;) -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com <mailto:danieldi...@gmail.com>
