Jed, I think that you misunderstand. The claims of heat storage during the
early October test are not referring to preheating, but merely containing all
of the heat supplied during the "warm up" phase. It does not require heating
before the test has begun, is there were no excess power.
I am not going to argue the merits of this, because this equine has obviously
passed into the ever-after. I just wanted to clarify.
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 22:14:03 -0500
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi clarification on Bianchini
From: jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Mary Yugo <maryyu...@gmail.com> wrote:
Let's be more specific. There could be a thermal mass heat storage
effect and there could be a chemical or change of stage/molten metal
type of heat storage or there could be Raney nickel type of reaction.
No, there couldn't be. The reactor would be hot to touch before the test. These
methods are impossible. It is strange that you call yourself a skeptic because
these beliefs are more implausible than cold fusion by a wide margin. A cold
fusion skeptic is a person who will believe any damn thing rather than the
simple truth.
- Jed
