I agree, the market will decide the optimum scale and location for these types 
of generating facilities for the best economy. 

The risk is that govs will intervene with tax credits and regulations to 
influence how and where energy is produced - this invariably leads to 
distortions and inefficiencies. Tax credits and deductions for solar panels and 
electric cars being notable examples.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Axil Axil 
  To: vortex-l@eskimo.com 
  Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2012 7:30 PM
  Subject: Re: [Vo]:The first real NiH reactor


  We are talking the cost effective generation of electricity here. 
  Let us draw proper lessens from recent history and current reality.

  If the production of electric power was more cost efficient in the individual 
home, then natural gas turbines would be now found in everyone’s basement; but 
there are no home centric gas/electric home generation products on the market. 
The big centralized natural gas turbines operated by large electric utilities 
are now and will always be the low cost provider.

  The idea that the independence of the individual is critical in the upcoming 
peak energy apocalypse according to the green renewable power doctrinaire is 
false. So it is extremely important that this groundless green concept must not 
be transferred to LENR electric power production.    

  NiH power production is a highly concentrated nuclear based form of power 
production. In the same way as fission power, high COP and huge economies of 
scale can be translated into ultra-low cost centralized electric power 
production by statewide or even regional electric utilities. 







   

  On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 7:52 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Alain Sepeda <alain.sep...@gmail.com> wrote:


      good design, but I think it is not adapted to the need.
      your design save energy, but at the cost of investment.
      the structure of LENR is that it is investment that cost, not fuel.

      so my vision is that classic water, moderate temperature, will will, 
because it will ensure the least total cost

      LENR is really a violent paradigm change in energy management.

      we were preparing for starvation, and it is bonanza. . . .



    Yup. Well said.

      see the nuclear reactors, working at low temperature for incresed safety 
and simplicity...
      LENR is even less expensive about consumption.


    I agree. I was going to make these points.


    - Jed



Reply via email to