The grid of the future is no grid (existing grid will transistion to a hot
backup for some time)
Distributed power systems will prevail long term since fuel and electrical
distribution/transmission costs & upkeep go towards zero $ and a
distributed system is much safer during war , solar flares, etc.
Distributed LENR systems will provide local CHP which is a big
plus.Equipment will be taxed, capitalized & depriciated.
On Sunday, February 19, 2012, Jay Caplan wrote:
> **
> I agree, the market will decide the optimum scale and location for these
> types of generating facilities for the best economy.
>
> The risk is that govs will intervene with tax credits and regulations to
> influence how and where energy is produced - this invariably leads to
> distortions and inefficiencies. Tax credits and deductions for solar panels
> and electric cars being notable examples.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Axil Axil <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'janap...@gmail.com');>
> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> 'vortex-l@eskimo.com');>
> *Sent:* Sunday, February 19, 2012 7:30 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:The first real NiH reactor
>
> We are talking the cost effective generation of electricity here.
> Let us draw proper lessens from recent history and current reality.
>
> If the production of electric power was more cost efficient in the
> individual home, then natural gas turbines would be now found in everyone’s
> basement; but there are no home centric gas/electric home generation
> products on the market. The big centralized natural gas turbines operated
> by large electric utilities are now and will always be the low cost
> provider.
>
>
> The idea that the independence of the individual is critical in the
> upcoming peak energy apocalypse according to the green renewable power
> doctrinaire is false. So it is extremely important that this groundless
> green concept must not be transferred to LENR electric power production.
>
> NiH power production is a highly concentrated nuclear based form of power
> production. In the same way as fission power, high COP and huge economies
> of scale can be translated into ultra-low cost centralized electric power
> production by statewide or even regional electric utilities.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 7:52 PM, Jed Rothwell
> <jedrothw...@gmail.com<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'jedrothw...@gmail.com');>
> > wrote:
>
>> Alain Sepeda <alain.sep...@gmail.com <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
>> 'alain.sep...@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>
>> good design, but I think it is not adapted to the need.
>>> your design save energy, but at the cost of investment.
>>> the structure of LENR is that it is investment that cost, not fuel.
>>>
>>> so my vision is that classic water, moderate temperature, will will,
>>> because it will ensure the least total cost
>>>
>>> LENR is really a violent paradigm change in energy management.
>>> we were preparing for starvation, and it is bonanza. . . .
>>>
>>
>> Yup. Well said.
>>
>>
>>> see the nuclear reactors, working at low temperature for incresed safety
>>> and simplicity...
>>> LENR is even less expensive about consumption.
>>
>>
>> I agree. I was going to make these points.
>>
>> - Jed
>>
>>
>
