*Yes. Right. We got it. However there are none available at present. Right? So why blame this particular design? Any currently available reactor would have failed in this accident.* ** ** ** The design of such a reactor was deminstated back in 1969.
FYI, the NRC will not license a reactor that is not based on a Light Water Reactor design. This killed the original 2008 self-regulating, uranium hydride reactor. >From Wikipedia Hydrogen Moderated Self-regulating Nuclear Power Module http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_Moderated_Self-regulating_Nuclear_Power_Module On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Axil Axil wrote: > > In a reactor design that does not have a need for a power supply then >> there is no chance for a problem with power supplies. >> >> > Yes. Right. We got it. However there are none available at present. Right? > So why blame this particular design? Any currently available reactor would > have failed in this accident. > > > > China is building a completely passive waste free commercial reactor to >> be available in 10 years. >> >> > Okay, so in 10 years a solution will be here. Japan presently has 50 > reactors turned off, and they cannot afford to replace them with Chinese > reactors available in 10 years. > > Anyway, even if cold fusion does not succeed, I think there is no chance > people will building uranium fission reactors 10 years from now. Certainly > they will not be in Japan. > > - Jed > >
