Bottom line: 

All the Godes/BEC are required to do - in order to silence the skeptics (and
at the same time receive all the funding they can ever use) is to
demonstrate conclusively the appearance of Helium in the ash.

Due to the lower cost of helium leak analyzers (compared to full featured
spectrometers) this is (possibly) not hard for them to do - even on a
restrictive budget they can rent one.

Tick, tick, tick, tick (sound of wall clock, marking time in the background)
....



                From: Alain Sepeda
                
                in fact they forgot to tell that the neutron is p^roduced
the same
                
                so
                p+e+energy->n +v
                n+1H->2H+energy
                p+e+energy-> n +v
                n+2H->3H+energy
                p+e+energy-> n  +v
                n+3H->4H+energy
                
                4H -> 4He + 2e+  + 2anti-v +Energy
                (this one is not classic, does somemone have reference on 4H
disintegration branching).
                one reason for double beta decay can be about (zero)
momentum conservation
                
                so it is 3 electron capture (inverse beta decay) and 3
neutron capture, finishing by 2  or a double beta+ decay (which?).
                
                in fact the vision proposed is : there is numerous inverse
beta decay, for some reason...
                this stream on neutrons is absorbed by near nucleus, and if
optimized, by hydrogen isotopes until 4H
                4H created decay quickly to 4He ...
                
                as Brillouin says, it is also possible tha neutron get
captured by metal if hydrogen does not do it earlier (because too few H,
because to many 4H/4He, because bad quantum state of H)
                

                Quote from Eric Lund: "I count four collisions that have to
happen for this
                process to operate as described:
                p + e- -> n + ν
                p + n -> 2H
                2H + n -> 3H
                3H + n -> 4H
                followed by a beta decay
                4H -> 4He + e- + antiν
                where ν represents a neutrino.
                The first collision and the beta decay are plausible. [nope:
it is
                implausible as well] What I don't see is how you get the
other three
                collisions to happen while conserving both energy and
momentum (and have
                them happen before the neutrons decay via n -> p + e- +
antiν). I don't see
                any evidence of intentional fraud, but the underlying
physics is, as Pauli
                put it, not even wrong. In stars, the way you get deuterium
is via p + p ->
                2H + e+ + ν.
                That's in addition to the implementation issues discussed in
the post."
                

<<attachment: winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to