2012/5/2 <[email protected]> > >4H -> 4He + 2e+ + 2anti-v +Energy > > > This should be 4H -> 4He + e- + anti-v + Energy. > (4H is one proton and three neutrons). > Oops, right, thanks for correction it is more simple.
> > Note the "silliness" of this situation: First the proton acquires an > electron, > at great energy cost, to become a neutron, which, after being absorbed > against > it's will by T, then decays to a proton again - via slow beta decay - as > opposed > to rapid ejection of a neutron! > > Perhaps needless to say, I think models in which the proton is and remains > a > proton are far more likely to be correct. > why... the global reaction is exothermic > > >(this one is not classic, does somemone have reference on 4H > disintegration > >branching). > > According to http://atom.kaeri.re.kr/ton/nuc1.html it decays via neutron > emission to H3 (very rapidly - order 1E-22 sec.), so I find it hard to > believe > that H3 is going to absorb a neutron to become H4! > (Brillouin argues that the data used to create the table is > wrong/inapplicable.) > good point against Brillouin. Even if possible the idea that "table are wrong" is an easy solution. > IMO both Brillouin & WL suffer from the same false assumption that has > almost > the entire scientific community in thrall. They assume that only neutrons > can > penetrate the Coulomb barrier at low temps. > alternative are no better, and changing from coulomb barrier to weak interaction barrier is opening interesting possibilities. no classic coulomb barrier breaking seems convincing... maybe WL abd Brillouin are not the good theories, but some ideas are interesting. neutrons, coherence, anyway all of those theories should be tested with good tools > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html > >
