Peter, If you are asking me I am Baptized Methodist and keep an open mind about all things religion. I think the Bible is a great human teaching and was constrained by the limits of human scientific knowledge at the time it was written. My 8th great grandfather arrived on the second Mayflower vessel and I have 8 generations of Yeoman farmers backing me.
I wonder how much the anthropic principle comes into play in our existance and experience: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropic_principle I think the f/$:! word was not needed. I give Jojo credit for his work on a reactor and would like to hear more about how that is coming. i am getting ready to try something myself. On Sunday, May 27, 2012, Peter Gluck wrote: > or or means simply that Darwinism and ID cannot be both true in the same > time and even any intermediate or combined solution is not possible. Just > from curiosity are you a Bible literalist as my friend G. including > Creation and Noah's Ark. You can write directly to me< I respect your > faith. > Peter > > On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Jojo Jaro <jth...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > ** > As I indicated before, I hesitated in posting about the fallacies of > Darwinian Evolution in this forum as I find this forum extremely useful and > don't want to clutter it with other subjects. There is no need to ask me > to stop as I have stopped and said I will only respond to any question > posted about it. > > Besides, the point that I wanted to make was clearly illustrated. > > While, I respect and admire you, I wished you had been more unbiased. If > I being an adherent of Intelligent Design and beleiver were to violate the > rules of civility of this forum and suggested to James to contort and > perform that unmanageable sexual act, I would be roundly criticized and > asked to leave, and no doubt by you. Am I not right? > > Where is the unbiased, moral outrage from you regarding the blatant > violation of the rules of civility of this forum? > > Demonstrate to me that you can be level-headed and demand an apology from > James and my admiration meter for you will jump. > > While an apology from James is not required for me to refrain from > discussing this topic, the lack of moral outrage from members regarding its > absence will greatly diminish my respect for members of this forum and > further serve to reinforce my assessment that members here are not really > as open-minded as they claim to be. > > > > > Jojo > > > > BTW, what do you mean by OR/OR dispute? > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Peter Gluck > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Sent:* Monday, May 28, 2012 12:00 AM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Darwinian Evolution (Was Tritium in Ni-H LENR) > > Dear Jojo, > > I would friendly suggest you to you to stop this discussion from the > simple reason that > the analogy is not valid. > Hot Fusion and Cold Fusion (LENR) are both real and possible, alternative, > in a way complementary solutions. > Evolution and Intelligent Project are opposites,mutually exclusive- and we > (you too) > can find hundreds of forums to discuss this subject ad infinitum. I am > reading Skeptic Magazine but my good friend G. who is a famous baptist > preacher keeps me informed with ID. > I think this was the first time this OR/OR dispute > was mentioned on this forum. But the analogy will not help. > > Peter > > > On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Jojo Jaro <jth...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > ** > OH my! What is your major malfunction? Are you experiencing major > cognitive dissonance? The Darwinian Evolution Religion you've pledge > yourself to is not as factual as you thought it was? Did I just hit a > central nerve? I thought we were discussing with civility? I guess I just > pissed you off too much with facts and logic. > > OK. Whatever. > >
