I remind the interview of Defkalion CTO saying that they initially tested many possibilities, and first Heat only, pressure and shocks, but that it was unreliable, so they abandon it to their polarized plasma method...
Reading that and Rossi claims I got to imagine that Rossi might have found a secret trick, and was also controlling the reactor more slowly... But with Rossi, who knows. He have no credibility capital to keep. The comment of Hydrofusion about tools, is terrible... that is clear accusation of fraud, with evidence. And yes, it is not a problem, research should be funded especially if it does not work well... Research is not there to find what is easy. It seems our science administrator and funders have forgotten that principle. 2012/9/10 Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> > Robert Lynn <robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> And any trust that may have been re-established in Rossi is now totally >> destroyed. >> > > No one in his right mind would ever trust Rossi. However, some of his > measurements have been inherently trustworthy despite the poor quality of > the tests and instruments. Some of his results were clearly in error, > especially during the NASA visit when the outlet hose was plugged up. > However, there have many other Ni-H results lately, and that fact plus the > fact that some of Rossi's results are credible makes me think he does have > something. > > I suppose his results are intermittent and unreliable. That's what you > expect with cold fusion. That is what you have to expect with any > technology at this stage of development. It is nothing to worry about. It > should not affect anyone's decision to fund the research. > > - Jed > >
