Yes, Axil, as a matter of fact, God did set up "evolution" to preserve and
protect life. It's called microevolution. God has put on the genone all the
necessary tools that an organism needs to rapidly change and adapt to
stressess. The organism merely expresses a dormant trait already encoded in
its DNA and this new trait enables him to adapt to a new environment. And
how wonderfully that has worked to preserve and protect life.
My issue is not that evolution happens, it does, it's called microevolution.
My issue is with the crackpot swiss cheese Darwinian Evolution theory that
speculates that changes are due to random mutation and that a species can
"evolve" into another species. It's this whole nonsense of "Tree of life" that
says we all came from single celled organisms; that I have a problem with.
Jojo
----- Original Message -----
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2012 2:56 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Digital information storage in DNA
Albert Einstein: “I want to know how God created this world. I am not
interested in this or that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element.
I want to know His thoughts; the rest are details.”
Who is arrogant enough to say what is in the mind of God. Who can say what
God’s plan of creation is?
Yes, there is Devine wisdom in God’s plan. If I were God, I would setup
evolution as a master plan for the creation of life to preserve and protect
life from the whims of the universe.
Cheers: Axil
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 6:00 AM, Nigel Dyer <l...@thedyers.org.uk> wrote:
My paid employment means that I spend significant numbers of hours each day
looking at DNA sequences, and the relationship between the DNA sequences of
different species, from single celled bacteria through to homo sapiens.
This shows, beyond a shadow of a doubt that the species 'evolved' from one
through to the next in a way that is normally described in short hand as
'Darwinian Evolution'. I am nevertheless always more than happy to discuss the
details as to the mechanisms by which the DNA changed during that process, and
the relationship between DNA sequence and form, as there are many unanswered,
and extremely interesting, questions to be asked.
The basic tenet of Darwian Evolution still holds. It is possible that
Darwinian Evolution is to the final evolutionary theory as Newtonian Physics is
to the final physics theory incorporating quantum theory and relativity.
Newtonian physics is not wrong, just not the complete picture. Ditto Darwinian
evolution.
Nigel
On 29/12/2012 10:06, Jojo Jaro wrote:
Axil, I think you mentioned this before.
The question is, is this trait really a trait from the dinosaur? Or is
it simply a trait of the chicken that laid dormant.
For one thing, we don't really know what Dinosaur traits there are. It
is irresponsible to say a specific trait belongs to dinosaurs. We don't know
that. It could simply be part of the trait of the chicken itself.
People ascribe these traits to dinosaurs only because they first assume
that chickens evolved from dinosaurs. But that is just a theory springing up
from our assumption that Darwinian Evolution is correct. We can not assume
Darwinian Evolution is correct then speculate that traits in chickens belong to
dinasaurs and then turn around and say the this is proof of Darwinian
Evolution. That is circular reasoning.
The most probable thing is that these traits in these so called "Junk
DNA" are actual coded traits of the Chicken DNA that laid dormant. During
microevolution, some of these traits are expressed and the chicken changes.
The changes are conferred by what is already in the DNA. Microevolution, not
Darwinian Evolution. Big difference and people always confuse the issue. They
think that just because we see changes, that that automatically imply Darwinian
Evolution is occuring. Yes, evolution is occuring, but not Darwinian Evolution.
Jojo
