Your statements about nationality and about adoption and nationality are incorrect.
What is your evidence for Obama being "registered as a Muslim"? On Jan 1, 2013, at 1:11 AM, Jojo Jaro wrote: > While what you are saying about Indonesian schools may be true today - I am > not knowledgeable about the current school system in Indonesia, so I will not > debate that. > > While that may be true, it surely wasn't true in the 70's when Obama went > there. Records show he was registered in that school as a muslim. > > > One more thing, he was adopted by an Indonesian muslim. If he was adopted to > be an Indonesian, he would have automatically lost his U.S. citizenship and > gained Indonesian citizenship and automatically became a muslim. In > Indonesia, you gain the religion of your adoptive father. Indonesia does not > have and never had a "Dual Citizenship" program with the US. Which means > that he would have had to reacquire his US citizenship when he reached 18. > He had to do something to gain back his US citizenship. Which automatically > made him a naturalized US citizen, not a Natural-Born US citizen required by > our constitution. > > One of my cousins was in the same boat and he was born about the same time as > Obama. He was born in U.S. soil (New York) but his parents brought him back > to the Philippines. By US law, as a minor, he has no official citizenship > status if there is a question as to his citizenship. In my cousin's case, he > was born on US soil to Filipino parents. Hence, his citizenship status was > in limbo, until he can make a decision when he turns 18. He can choose to be > Filipino or US citizen. When my cousin turned 18, he had to go to the US > Embassy to choose US citizen and get his papers (passport). He is considered > a Naturalized US citizen. A person that has to take action to gain US > citizenship is not a Natural Born US citizen. This is the status of Obama > even if he was indeed born in Hawaii. He would still be a Naturalized US > citizen and hence unqualified. > > So, as you can see, Obama is unqualified to be POTUS on many fronts. The > argument about whether he was born in Hawaii or not is just one aspect of his > qualification (non-qualification) to be POTUS. > > In a free society like America, such questions about his qualifications > should have been vetted openly. If there was even a hint as to his > qualifications, it should have been settled publicly and openly. Why don't > people take this issue seriously. Even if people think that his BC was > original and valid, people should still be calling for it to be settled once > and for all. Open up the vault copy. No other steps or half measures will > do. Great controversies require great measures to settle. Let the Birthers > see it and it they are wrong, you get the chance to humiliate them to your > heart's content. If I am wrong about this, I'm sure I will have great shame > and tuck my tail between my legs and go away quietly. > > > > > > > Jojo > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: de Bivort Lawrence > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2013 12:59 AM > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Birther Myth? or Lomax lies > > The earlier posting on "muslim" schools is confused. > > Some "Muslim" schools have a curriculum that is based solely on the Qur'an. > This kind of school would only attract non-Muslim students interested in the > Qur'an, or in the culture of Islam. > > Some "Muslim" schools have a standard secular curriculum, and are attended > mostly by Muslims, thus confusing some into calling them "Muslim" schools. > > Some "Muslim" schools are merely called such because they operate in a Muslim > country, like Indonesia. This is like calling US public schools "Christian" > because they operate in a predominantly Christian country. > > To suggest that President Obama must be a Muslim because he went to a > "Muslim" school in Indonesia is a statement that at best is meaningless. > > > On Dec 31, 2012, at 4:37 AM, Nigel Dyer wrote: > >> Indeed. There is a Catholic school in Birmingham, UK, where the majority >> of pupils are Muslim >> >> http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/local-news/birminghams-catholic-school-where-90-of-the-pupils-231115 >> >> Nigel >> >> On 31/12/2012 04:40, Jojo Jaro wrote: >>> Yes, "Christian" catholic schools are more tolerant of other faiths, but >>> not muslims. You can not go to a muslim school like the one Obama went to >>> unless you are a muslim. >>> >>> Before Lomax spins this again; may I simply ask readers to research this on >>> their own to see which of us both is lying. >>> >>> >>> Jojo >>> >> >
