Kevin, I think that what Dr. Storms is stating about the dangerous radiation emission is valid. In your scenario, the balloon is surrounded by many others that absorb the high energy emissions. How does it account for balloons that are very near to the edge of the bundle? If high level energy is released by any LENR activity, then it would be expected to escape unless a process exists that works well over an extremely short distance. Also, I an unaware of any process that is effective in stopping free energetic neutrons under similar conditions.
Do you have a theory that limits the LENR activity to locations that are always deeply inside the active regions and also eliminates neutron release? Any known hot fusion process would produce dangerous particles in great quantities. Some of these emissions can be captured, but many would escape. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Mon, Feb 11, 2013 4:35 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bose Einstein Condensate formed at Room Temperature On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: In the case of cold fusion, the process does not produce energetic products and the final product is an intact helium nucleus. Nevertheless, the nuclear energy appears as heat. Of course, radiation is produced and some is detected outside of the apparatus. However, the energy of the radiation is not consistent with a single release of energy as is the case with hot fusion. In this way, the two processes are entirely different. This difference MUST be taken into account in any explanation. Ed ***My balloon analogy accounts for the difference. The reason why the energy is not consistent with hot-fusion emission is that most of the energy gets absorbed into the lattice. There are some LENR theories out there such as phonons greatly contributing to the absorption, and lately Ron Maimon's theory of Auger deuterons may even account for the absorption plus the transmutations in the strange way they've been showing up. http://rolling-balance.blogspot.com/2013/01/ron-maimons-theory.html If you read my papers, you would already know exactly what I claim. ***It would save all of us a lot of time if you spent the one minute necessary to read and process my analogy, rather than asking me to spend 100 hours to understand your theory. It is doubtless I will have trouble understanding your theory when I do embark on this endeavor. Even then, those 100 hours spent would be no guarantee that I would immediately comprehend your shorthand approach to emails on vortex.
