Dawkins is an example of 'atheist theology' (oxymoron).  He seems to desire a 
neat, ordered, understandable world without any Creator behind it.  He extends 
traditional moral concerns to general society, as if they still had a Divine 
authority behind them.  Why is objective truth important?  Why aren't some lies 
better?

I prefer to think that the lack of a Creator suggests that we should expect a 
sort of patchwork universe, full of paradoxes and anomalies - such as 
Feyerabend suggested. It would make a lot more sense - and might lead us into 
unexpected discoveries.

Reply via email to