A question for Ed: On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The definition of "success rate" in these experiments is fuzzy. Ed stated > with 90 cathodes. He tested them and identified 4 that met all of his > criteria. These 4 worked robustly, and repeatedly. So, is that a 5% success > rate, starting from the 90 cathodes? Or is it a 100% success rate, with the > 4 good ones? > Regarding the four cathodes that "worked robustly, and repeatedly" ... how long did they work for? Are they still working? Do you know why they worked? Can working duplicates be made? [mg]
