* Evidence of electromagnetic radiation from Ni-H Systems * http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&sqi=2&ved=0CDsQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fnewenergytimes.com%2Fv2%2Flibrary%2F2004%2F2004Focardi-EvidenceOfElectromagneticRadiation.pdf&ei=-NpdUemSBITB4AP364CYBA&usg=AFQjCNHu3w5dimV_JIaouNutOQePoXu2Pg&sig2=ZCZ6WnU2Vjiyx3rrr9DHFQ
I have posted this about a half dozen times so far, but you seem to have a block to it. This experiment shows the reaction with and without gamma radiation On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* Axil Axil **** > > ** ** > > *The reason this claim of W-L theory is ludicrous --- Of course this is > not LENR, but it is the model for gamma downshifting, and if you want to > assert two distinct miracles - then it is wise to show some other evidence > than the very phenomenon you wish to explain - with your outrageous claim. > ***** > > **** > > Gamma suppression does not cause LENR; it is accidental to the LENR > reaction.**** > > **** > > However, it is still very important. It is the principle demarcation line > between LENR and LENR+.**** > > ** ** > > Nonsense. There is no such thing as “gamma suppression” … It is a complete > fabrication of W-L without a shred of evidence AFAIK… if you have the > evidence, please show it**** > > **** > > The LENR reaction emits gammas and this energy release destroys the > nuclear active sites. The LENR reactions will soon stop as the NAE are > blown apart and cratered.**** > > ** ** > > More disinformation. There is no possibility of nano-sized sites stopping > gamma radiation. This requires thick lead shielding.**** > > **** > > On the other hand, LENR+ thermalizes the energy that is produced in the > NAE as a secondary mechanism, but this thermalization of the reaction > allows the LENR+ reaction to occur over and over again from the same NAE > for months on end.**** > > ** ** > > There is no evidence for this.**** > > ** ** >
