On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> It seems a bit more logical to suggest that the lack of gammas can be > better > explained by the lack of the kind of nuclear reaction that produces gammas. > The most prevalent nuclear reaction in the Universe, reversible proton > fusion, produces no gammas. Shouldn't we be taking a closer look at RPF? > > > Wikipedia says proton-proton fusion produces a neutrino and a positron. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton%E2%80%93proton_chain_reaction Won't this result in an electron-positron anihilation and two gamma rays? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron%E2%80%93positron_annihilation Harry
