On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 2:36 AM, Joshua Cude <joshua.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
Doesn't answer the question. ***Of course it does. It just establishes the failure of the evidence. ***No, it establishes the real reason why "intelligent people" don't get involved in Cold Fusion. The reason for the derision ***Sneering is against the rules here. is because intelligent people don't buy your indisputable proof. ***Nope. It's because you're a skeptopath. Others just like to pile on and when we scratch the surface, we find they're utterly uninformed about the evidence. If intelligent people bought it, the skeptics would be the ones whose careers would be dragged through the mud. ***You proceed from an odd form of idealism. Scientists are human. > On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Joshua Cude <joshua.c...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> >>> If this is such indisputable proof, why is it that intelligent people >>> don't buy it? Do they hate the thought of clean and abundant energy? We >>> know that's not the case from the events of 1989. >>> >>> >>> >> ***because intelligent people don't like having their careers dragged >> through the mud. >> > > > Doesn't answer the question. It just establishes the failure of the > evidence. > > > The reason for the derision is because intelligent people don't buy your > indisputable proof. If intelligent people bought it, the skeptics would be > the ones whose careers would be dragged through the mud. > > > >
