On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 2:42 AM, Joshua Cude <joshua.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > That's a reflection of what mainstream science thinks of cold fusion. It > doesn't answer the question of why, if the proof is so obvious, > ***Interesting little conditional you've inserted here. The proof is not obvious but the evidence is. With so much evidence, with >14000 replications, the evidence is compelling. This is far from a pathological science. > mainstream science holds that view, including when they are enlisted to > study the best evidence. > > > ***There is simply far too much latitude granted to such studies. An example is the 2 times there were investigations into Space Shuttle accidents. The recommendations of the panels were that management wasn't to blame, but management was to blame. > > > > A graduate student in science would probably ruin their career by studying > astrology or creationism too. It says something about the fields. > > ***If a grad student in physics were to study astrology, it's obvious they've stepped out of their core competence. But if they want to study Condensed Matter Nuclear Science and LENR, they're within their core competence. It says nothing particularly relevant about the field of astrology. Your ridiculous analogy says something about human nature. > > > >
