On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Joshua Cude <joshua.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 2:42 AM, Joshua Cude <joshua.c...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> That's a reflection of what mainstream science thinks of cold fusion. It >>> doesn't answer the question of why, if the proof is so obvious, >>> >> ***Interesting little conditional you've inserted here. The proof is >> not obvious but the evidence is. With so much evidence, with >14000 >> replications, the evidence is compelling. This is far from a pathological >> science. >> > > There are a lot of claimed examples of excess heat. They are not > replications, because many of the experiments are different, and the levels > of claimed heat are all over the map. > > > The question stands. If the evidence is so compelling, why don't > intelligent people accept it? > > > > > Why are some intelligent people racist?
